Oct. 16th, 2006

[Rule quoted from Robert's Rules of Writing: 101 Unconventional Lessons Every Writer Needs to Know by Robert Masello (Writer's Digest Books, 2005). See my original post for the rules of this discussion.]

According to Masello's rule #60, one of the best things about being a writer is that you get to be nosy. Because only by being nosy do you get the details right.

It's fairly obvious that research is invaluable if you're writing nonfiction. If the article you're writing is supposed to be based on fact, you need to know the facts, and sometimes the best way to get those facts is by asking questions.

But it's also true that good fiction also relies on those twin concepts of accuracy and verisimilitude.

Although Masello mostly discusses how asking questions can help you create more believable characters, I'd like to revisit an experience of my own in asking questions -- and, in some sense, in being shameless.

A few years ago, I was working on a project for which I needed some information on what the FBI did on 9/11 and shortly afterwards. I had read some articles on how the events had affected them, but nothing gave me the immediate details that I needed to make a particular story come alive. And so I picked up the phone and called the FBI's New York City offices.

Fortunately, most law enforcement agencies have public information officers, whose job it is to deal with the press and public. I reached one of those agents, explained what I needed, and asked if it might be possible for me to pay a visit to their offices. As it so happened, Nomi and I were planning one of our regular trips to New York within a few weeks, and so we made an appointment to visit with the agent on a Wednesday.

We learned a lot on that visit, and I picked up some detail that will be useful if I ever do get back to that particular project. For example, the elevators that go to the FBI offices are behind bulletproof glass. When visiting, you have to turn over all personal electronics and weapons, and you have to wear a bright yellow badge that identifies you as a visitor. You are not to wander anywhere alone; you must have an escort with you at all times. (Of course, the details I really wanted was the feel of the offices, and I got that as well. But the impact I felt was mostly what it was like to be a visitor.)

Afterwards, Nomi and I still felt a certain level of disbelief that we had been allowed to visit the FBI's offices. But that disbelief was tempered with the knowledge of how we had done it. Basically, I had taken myself seriously as a writer, as someone who would have a legitimate reason for visiting the FBI's offices, in order to get the details right on a piece of fiction. By following my own dictum of not knowing shame, I was brave enough to make that phone call and request a visit.

So when it comes to Robert's Rule #60, I'm behind him 100%.

Copyright © Michael Burstein
Once again, I'm trying to figure out exactly what my blogging is for. I don't want this blog just to be about my personal life, such as it is. I want it to be commentary and discussion on things that interest me. The problem is that my interests are many and varied. So my blog isn't necessarily the "go-to" spot if you want to read specifically about science, let's say, or comics, because I cover both of those, and not necessarily in depth.

Sometimes, I wish I could maintain a few separate blogs, each devoted to an individual topic, such as science, history, comics, science fiction, politics, and writing. That way, people could read the blog that focuses on their own particular interest. But I don't think I post enough to support all those separate blogs. So I rely on tags. If you are primarily interested in one particular topic, you can check the tag and get an idea of whether or not I'm covering such a thing in a particular post.

And why am I ruminating on this? I have no idea. Maybe it's because, as you may have already noticed, I've finally posted a new response to one of Robert's Rules of Writing. I know I've fallen behind my intended schedule of posting these, but I look at it this way -- those of you who are reading here for writing discussion have something to look forward to.

Maybe I should do a poll to see if I should do a poll. It could look like this:


[Poll #846248]

(Note that with check boxes, you can vote "Yes," "No," and "Narf!" Existential fun for all!)

Copyright © Michael Burstein

December 2016

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526 2728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 11th, 2025 07:16 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios