Holocaust Denial, Again
Jan. 27th, 2009 11:15 amThis past Saturday, the New York Times ran the article Pope Reinstates Four Excommunicated Bishops, in which they reported that Pope Benedict XVI has revoked the excommunications of four bishops described as being on the far right.
While in general this news item wouldn't concern me one way or another, it does, for the following reason (quoted from the article):
The problem of Holocaust denial is one that has so plagued me that I wrote a whole story about it ("Kaddish for the Last Survivor"). The simple historical fact of the Holocaust is as incontrovertible as American slavery and the many other injustices that have taken place in human history. And yet, it seems that there will always be people among us who wish to deny the truth, and whose motives I would suspect are not rooted in a desire to paint the human race as angels.
Bishop Williamson's erroneous (and to my mind, malicious) belief that there is no historical evidence for the Holocaust may have been repudiated by the Vatican spokesman. But in this case, sad to say, actions speak louder than words.
While in general this news item wouldn't concern me one way or another, it does, for the following reason (quoted from the article):
Among the men reinstated Saturday was Richard Williamson, a British-born cleric who in an interview last week said he did not believe that six million Jews died in the Nazi gas chambers. He has also given interviews saying that the United States government staged the Sept. 11 attacks as a pretext to invade Afghanistan.
The problem of Holocaust denial is one that has so plagued me that I wrote a whole story about it ("Kaddish for the Last Survivor"). The simple historical fact of the Holocaust is as incontrovertible as American slavery and the many other injustices that have taken place in human history. And yet, it seems that there will always be people among us who wish to deny the truth, and whose motives I would suspect are not rooted in a desire to paint the human race as angels.
Bishop Williamson's erroneous (and to my mind, malicious) belief that there is no historical evidence for the Holocaust may have been repudiated by the Vatican spokesman. But in this case, sad to say, actions speak louder than words.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 05:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 05:15 pm (UTC)On the somewhat amusing side, he sounds quite a bit like Anthony Hopkins, which makes the interview appear to be given by Hannibal Lecter.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 05:56 pm (UTC)While the movement is not being legitimized, by accepting people who took ordination from the movement certainly weakens the repudiation of their theology.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 05:57 pm (UTC)Why bother? Because there are thousands of people caught in a kind of schism, led by these nutbars. (Though, I don't know that the other SSPX bishops are quite as bad.) Removing the excommunications is the first step in attempting to reunify.
Honestly, they're so prideful and disobedient, I expect them to be excommunicated again in a few years. :-/
I try not to think about the SSPX too much. They irritate me more than just about anyone, no exaggeration.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 06:32 pm (UTC)We'll just ignore little things like the Spanish Inquisition, the Crusades, and the molestation of children for the time being.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 07:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 07:10 pm (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Benedict_XVI
To summarize, he was unwillingly enrolled in Hitler youth at age 14, as required of all German boys, but refused to attend meetings. Later, he was also unwillingly drafted into the German army, but deserted.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 07:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 08:03 pm (UTC)Any fact people don't like, that doesn't fit into their vision of reality, they try to change. Even if it doesn't make sense. Because very little of what people believe or do has anything to do with making sense.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 09:45 pm (UTC)As for Williamson, I really do not understand the fuss being made over the lifting of his excommunication. I think the Jewish organisations who are protesting this are doing themselves and all Jews a disservice. Had Williamson been excommunicated for being an antisemitic prick, or for having delusional views of history, then it would be outrageous for that excommunication to be lifted without him recanting his views. But he wasn't; he was excommunicated for having accepted ordination as a bishop from Lefebvre, and now that the pope is trying to make peace this is an appropriate gesture. Peace is supposed to be a good thing, isn't it? Why should his views on the Holocaust be relevant? If Ivan Demjanjuk were to be convicted of dealing drugs, and were, after a while, to come up for parole, would his wartime crimes be relevant?
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 10:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 02:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 03:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 03:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 03:11 am (UTC)Whatever you decide, thanks for the interest.
Israeli Chief Rabbinate formally cuts ties with Vatican over Williamson reinstatement
Date: 2009-01-28 02:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 02:19 pm (UTC)Re: Israeli Chief Rabbinate formally cuts ties with Vatican over Williamson reinstatement
Date: 2009-01-28 03:07 pm (UTC)