Galley Impressions
Mar. 3rd, 2005 02:48 pmI received my galleys from Analog today for "TelePresence."
For those of you who don't know, galleys is the name given to a story when it's set in type, but not yet published. Basically, it's the writer's last chance to look at the story and make corrections. Sometimes those corrections are needed because of a mistake you made when writing the story, but sometimes you want to fix a change the editor made. And sometimes it's just a question of making sure that hyphenated words are broken in the right place and that quotation marks face in the correct direction.
But for me, all that is secondary to the experience I have when I hold the galleys in my hand. For the first time, the story feels real. I start to read it again, and instead of seeing it as a manuscript I'm working on, I see it as a full-fledged work of fiction...and I find myself getting lost in the tale. For some reason, the story just reads better when set in type, and I sometimes find myself marveling over the work, even though it's my own. I'll come to one turn of phrase and say, "Wow. Did I write that?" Or I'll read a scene and get drawn into the conflict and the characters. The story is no longer an amorphous blob; it's a real story, a work of fiction, and something I can finally be proud of.
I wonder if other writers react the same way.
For those of you who don't know, galleys is the name given to a story when it's set in type, but not yet published. Basically, it's the writer's last chance to look at the story and make corrections. Sometimes those corrections are needed because of a mistake you made when writing the story, but sometimes you want to fix a change the editor made. And sometimes it's just a question of making sure that hyphenated words are broken in the right place and that quotation marks face in the correct direction.
But for me, all that is secondary to the experience I have when I hold the galleys in my hand. For the first time, the story feels real. I start to read it again, and instead of seeing it as a manuscript I'm working on, I see it as a full-fledged work of fiction...and I find myself getting lost in the tale. For some reason, the story just reads better when set in type, and I sometimes find myself marveling over the work, even though it's my own. I'll come to one turn of phrase and say, "Wow. Did I write that?" Or I'll read a scene and get drawn into the conflict and the characters. The story is no longer an amorphous blob; it's a real story, a work of fiction, and something I can finally be proud of.
I wonder if other writers react the same way.
Galleys
Date: 2005-03-03 08:01 pm (UTC)Re: Galleys
Date: 2005-03-03 08:09 pm (UTC)Re: Galleys
Date: 2005-03-03 08:15 pm (UTC)On an unrelated note, are you going to Readercon up in your neck of the woods? Unfortunately, it conflicts with Shore Leave again. I miss Readercon. Of course, it was easier from Albany NY than it is from Houston TX.
Will look forward to your latest Analog story as I'm a faithful subscriber.
Re: Galleys
Date: 2005-03-03 08:29 pm (UTC)I'm delighted to hear that you are a faithful subscriber to Analog! The Big Three short fiction magazines (Analog, Asimov's, F&SF) have been experiencing a precipitous drop in circulation; I'm desperately hoping they bounce back.
Re: Galleys
Date: 2005-03-03 08:33 pm (UTC)By the way, I'd hoped to bump into you in the Exhibits room at ALA Mid-winter, but I guess it was not meant to be. Worldcon or NasFic perhaps, or there's always Readercon next year.
Re: Galleys
Date: 2005-03-03 08:42 pm (UTC)Ah, well. It's unlikely we'll make it to Worldcon this year, so we're probably looking at Readercon 2006.
Re: Galleys
Date: 2005-03-03 08:43 pm (UTC)Re: Galleys
Date: 2005-03-03 09:53 pm (UTC)Re: Galleys
Date: 2005-03-03 10:01 pm (UTC)Zhaneel
Re: Galleys
Date: 2005-03-03 10:14 pm (UTC)Re: Galleys
Date: 2005-03-03 10:18 pm (UTC)Worst comes to worst, I'll hold out until LA Con. Where, with Teleprescene you should be up for another Hugo.
Zhaneel
Re: Galleys
Date: 2005-03-03 10:27 pm (UTC)Thank you. I certainly hope your prediction comes true.
It would be nice; LAcon III (1996) was my first Worldcon, and at the time, "TeleAbsence" was up for a Hugo and I was up for the Campbell. I would love it if ten years later, the sequel were up for a Hugo...and this time, I were to win.
Re: Galleys
Date: 2005-03-03 10:02 pm (UTC)I'll be at NASFiC (not enough money for WorldCon) so I look forward to seeing you there.
Zhaneel
Reacting the same way
Date: 2005-03-03 08:10 pm (UTC)Re: Reacting the same way
Date: 2005-03-03 08:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-03 08:15 pm (UTC)Fortunately, I have that skill as well. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2005-03-03 08:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-03 08:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-03 08:31 pm (UTC)Asimov said it made him very glad to be a writer, as he wasn't dependent upon anyone else to appreciate his own work.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-03 08:33 pm (UTC)So, which issue of Analog is it going to be appearing in?
no subject
Date: 2005-03-03 08:45 pm (UTC)You know, it's because you chose TeleAbsence to appear in WONDROUS BEGINNINGS that I decided to write TelePresence. So it's all your fault.
(Although my acknowledgment line is to Tom Easton, because he's the one who told me what the sequel had to be about...)
Interestingly, the galleys omit the line Stan usually puts in about a story being a sequel...I'd better point that out to them when sending in my feedback, in case it was an oversight.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-03 08:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-03 09:00 pm (UTC)Here's a preview for you:
****
A tall bearded man named Steven Silver grunted. "It's not the same," he said, and one of the women, a petite lady named Crystal Bordewieck, frowned and nodded in agreement.
Well, Tony thought, at least I now know who my main opposition is.
****
no subject
Date: 2005-03-03 09:08 pm (UTC)So, any chance of you and
no subject
Date: 2005-03-03 09:54 pm (UTC)Dang it.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-03 08:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-03 10:08 pm (UTC)1) Seeing my article appear on SH in "galley" form, in that it was all typeset and I had to access a super-secret webpage to edit it. That made it more real.
2) Reading a book via Word and then buying it in hardbound. Even though it was the same, the book was more real. I managed to not engage my internal editor while reading the .RTF version, but it was damn hard 'cause that is where I edit so much of my stuff.
Zhaneel
no subject
Date: 2005-03-03 10:31 pm (UTC)