Reader Identification
May. 4th, 2005 09:59 amYesterday, in this post,
sdelmonte brought to my attention a new project from Randy Cohen, a writer for the New York Times.
In his essay, We'll Map Manhattan (the link should work even without registration), Cohen explains that he wants to create a "literary map" of Manhattan, which will list the homes and other important locations associated with characters from literary works.
I'm personally fascinated and delighted by this project. On a self-serving note, I'm scouring my own minor bibliography to see what Manhattan locations my own characters used. On the other hand, I grew up in New York City and love reading about the city and its history, so such a project would naturally appeal to me. But on a broader scale, what delights me about this whole project is the concept of reader identification.
Lawrence Block discusses this concept in his essay "Mirror, Mirror on the Page," which can be found in his book Spider, Spin Me a Web: Lawrence Block on Writing Fiction. A bookstore proprietor recommended a book to him once set in Santa Barbara, with the promise that it was filled with local color. Block discovered that the book's story could have been set anywhere, but by identifying specific parts of Santa Barbara, the writer had managed to appeal to people from that city.
I think we all experience that in some way, and not just in books. I grew up in Forest Hills, Queens, and am bizzarely proud of the fact that so did Peter Parker (AKA Spider-Man). When
gnomi and I went to see the first Spider-Man movie here in the Boston area, I jumped out of my seat when I saw Parker running through the intersection of Austin Street and Ascan Avenue, three blocks from where I grew up (and where, coincidentally, the first comic book store I patronized was located). I've often joked with people by saying that we used to see Spider-Man swinging through the streets on his way home from Manhattan.
Why does this identification with place resonante so vividly? Block suggests a few explanations, but the one that resonates most with me is this one: "...the presence of real parts of our own real world helps convince us that the writer knows what he's talking about... The more I can accept the idea that the author knows whereof he writes, the easier it is for me to believe further that the fictional story he's relating is true -- and it is upon this voluntary suspension of disbelief that fiction depends for much of its power to move us."
In his essay, We'll Map Manhattan (the link should work even without registration), Cohen explains that he wants to create a "literary map" of Manhattan, which will list the homes and other important locations associated with characters from literary works.
I'm personally fascinated and delighted by this project. On a self-serving note, I'm scouring my own minor bibliography to see what Manhattan locations my own characters used. On the other hand, I grew up in New York City and love reading about the city and its history, so such a project would naturally appeal to me. But on a broader scale, what delights me about this whole project is the concept of reader identification.
Lawrence Block discusses this concept in his essay "Mirror, Mirror on the Page," which can be found in his book Spider, Spin Me a Web: Lawrence Block on Writing Fiction. A bookstore proprietor recommended a book to him once set in Santa Barbara, with the promise that it was filled with local color. Block discovered that the book's story could have been set anywhere, but by identifying specific parts of Santa Barbara, the writer had managed to appeal to people from that city.
I think we all experience that in some way, and not just in books. I grew up in Forest Hills, Queens, and am bizzarely proud of the fact that so did Peter Parker (AKA Spider-Man). When
Why does this identification with place resonante so vividly? Block suggests a few explanations, but the one that resonates most with me is this one: "...the presence of real parts of our own real world helps convince us that the writer knows what he's talking about... The more I can accept the idea that the author knows whereof he writes, the easier it is for me to believe further that the fictional story he's relating is true -- and it is upon this voluntary suspension of disbelief that fiction depends for much of its power to move us."
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 02:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 03:55 pm (UTC)2. The problem with using real places is that when the writer gets it wrong, it takes the native reader right back out of the story. An example is any time that Donald Westlake, once a resident of NYC, gets a detail wrong. He has a regular character working at a Safeway in Manhattan, which I can never get used to. And he has gotten details about Long Isalnd wrong frequently. I love Westlake's work, and he is usually a very careful writer, so when he goofs, it stands out.
There is also the example of how Stephen King, in the second Dark Tower novel, places Co-Op City in Brooklyn. It's a silly mistake, one easily corrected by a decent copy editor, and there it sits, dragging me out of the moment. King, to his credit, fesses up to the mistake in later books in the series (where he is himself a character) and even uses the mistake as part of the story, but I always wonder just how such a basic error can happen. (It also seems to prove that King, another author I love, really is not edited that closely and never has been.)
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 04:34 pm (UTC)The second Spider-Man movie threw me out of the story briefly, because there are no "el" trains inside Manhattan...but I had advance warning when the filming took place here in Chicago. A friend of mine was an "extra" that never got on camera, so I spent the scene looking for my friend on the platforms whizzing by instead of watching the fight. ;)
And speaking of Long Island...ask me how much I freaked out when I did the "math" after reading The Great Gatsby and realised that I grew up in East Egg! A later edition that included a map confirmed this (although they called it "Manhasset Neck," which was never it's name...it was once called Cow's Neck, true. But it went directly from that to the name Port Washington, when our esteemed first president paid a visit. Manhasset is down at the joint between the two "eggs," Great Neck and P.W.) But it was really freaky, in a good way! ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 07:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-05 02:35 am (UTC)As did in the first movie when they used Low Library as a science building. But then again, I always get a kick out seeing my Alma Mater on the big screen. Even when they get it wrong (like in The Mirror has Two Faces.)
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 04:30 pm (UTC)In fact, I had just moved away from NYC, where I had been attending that church (Holy Trinity Lutheran on Central Park West). Oddly, after many years, about a year ago I started attending the same church again.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 07:45 pm (UTC)"But where will we find a mate fit for a King?"
"Queens!"
the audience cheered.
I've also enjoyed applauding when Rick Blaine warns Major Strasser in Casablanca that there are certain parts of New York City he should avoid invading...
no subject
Date: 2005-05-05 01:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 06:18 pm (UTC)Now, add to that that a favorite professor of mine was an extra and very prominently shown as a juror type in the climatic scene for several minutes and it's really weird to watch.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 07:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 08:50 pm (UTC)Maybe it's just that I've spent so much time in Princeton, New York, and Jerusalem, but I feel like places have their own distinct and organic personalities, that where something is set changes what is told. Noir set in New York is very different from Noir set in LA. Urban fantasy in Chicago would be hell and gone from urban fantasy set in Jerusalem. For Joss Whedon, the ship is a character, but for me, I guess the city takes that role.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-09 02:58 am (UTC)