Forgetting History
Jul. 28th, 2005 10:11 amI just spoke with Lydia Ruth, the Director of Public Relations at the Empire State Building, who graciously returned a phone call to me asking about the 60th anniversary of the B-25 bomber crash. Ms. Ruth told me that there was no event planned to commemorate the event or to memorialize the victims. Sadly, the reason is because there's not much interest in the tragedy anymore. Five years ago, for the 55th anniversary, they did have a memorial, but no one came, not even the press.
Ms. Ruth also told me that I'm the youngest person ever to ask about a memorial for the event. Most of the people who call her about it are much older, and were actual witnesses to the crash.
I think that's rather a shame. I know that as time passes, historical events get forgotten, as even the immediate families and friends of the victims pass on. But in today's post-9/11 world, I thought that this city might have finally chosen to begin looking back at its past, to learn from what had happened before in order to deal with what's happening today. But as I read the local papers this morning and scanned the local television news, not a single reference to the anniversary could I find.
(For those interested in irony, Ms. Ruth returned my call just before 10 AM -- the same time when the plane hit the building, sixty years ago today.)
Perhaps I can do something to remind people of the event, like I did to remind people of the General Slocum tragedy with Time Ablaze. Maybe in five years there'll be enough interest for a milestone commemoration.
Ms. Ruth also told me that I'm the youngest person ever to ask about a memorial for the event. Most of the people who call her about it are much older, and were actual witnesses to the crash.
I think that's rather a shame. I know that as time passes, historical events get forgotten, as even the immediate families and friends of the victims pass on. But in today's post-9/11 world, I thought that this city might have finally chosen to begin looking back at its past, to learn from what had happened before in order to deal with what's happening today. But as I read the local papers this morning and scanned the local television news, not a single reference to the anniversary could I find.
(For those interested in irony, Ms. Ruth returned my call just before 10 AM -- the same time when the plane hit the building, sixty years ago today.)
Perhaps I can do something to remind people of the event, like I did to remind people of the General Slocum tragedy with Time Ablaze. Maybe in five years there'll be enough interest for a milestone commemoration.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 02:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 02:55 pm (UTC)When 9/11 happened, my first indication was an email that a plane had crashed into one of the towers. I immediately flashed to the ESB crash, and assumed some lone pilot in a small prop plane had gone off course.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 02:59 pm (UTC)9/11: So did I, actually. In fact, that was the last time I remembered the ESB crash before you brought it up again, when people were initially wondering how a plane could crash into a skyscraper. (Of course, as you pointed out, the 1945 crash was due to fog.)
no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 03:03 pm (UTC)Being as fond of history (and NYC history) as I am, 9/11 reminded me of the ESB crash, the General Slocum, and the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 03:20 pm (UTC)I just wish we had a way of letting The Powers That Be know that we want them to release the series. Somewhere I have videotapes of the show from off the Sci-Fi Channel, when they broadcast it about ten years ago. A DVD set would be much cooler.
P.S.
Date: 2005-07-28 02:50 pm (UTC)Re: P.S.
Date: 2005-07-28 02:56 pm (UTC)(Brainstorming--don't mine me)
Date: 2005-07-28 03:00 pm (UTC)Re: (Brainstorming--don't mine me)
Date: 2005-07-28 03:04 pm (UTC)If I could bring Lucas Schmidt and Adele Weber back into it, I could use the story to expand the novella into a novel...
Re: P.S.
Date: 2005-07-28 03:02 pm (UTC)On the other hand, one of Bruce Boston's Rhysling-nominated poems this year was just an extended version of a poem he had in Star*Line about 20-odd years ago, which was reprinted in the early 1980's in a poetry anthology titled Burning With A Vision. Then again, maybe some folks figure after 20 years you won't notice...I probably wouldn't have except I was reading the current Rhysling anthology and BWAV the same night!
Re: P.S.
Date: 2005-07-28 03:06 pm (UTC)Sounds like Bruce Boston was doing what prose writers do when expanding shorter works into longer ones, as I mentioned thinking of doing above.
Re: P.S.
Date: 2005-07-28 03:12 pm (UTC)Re: P.S.
Date: 2005-07-28 03:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-29 03:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-31 04:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-01 03:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-01 03:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-01 03:12 am (UTC)