More Good Reviews
Aug. 8th, 2005 04:53 amRan across this review of the September 2005 Analog (and other magazines) in SF Revu which has made me feel a little better:
The lead story in the September 2005 issue of Analog is just the kind of high quality story we have come to expect from Michael Burstein. "Sanctuary" begins during a Roman Catholic mass being said in a chapel on a space station. It is interrupted by an alien seeking sanctuary to prevent the baby she is carrying from being aborted. What is impressive is that Burstein has done his research and probably knows more about Catholicism than 90% of Roman Catholics. In addition to that, he writes a very good story.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-08 10:59 am (UTC)Condolences on the Hugo loss. We know in our heads that popularity is fickle and that awards are a tricky business, but that doesn't stop us from wanting one.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-09 01:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-08 11:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-08 12:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-09 01:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-09 11:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-08 02:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-08 02:56 pm (UTC)And I'm glad you liked the story and the way I portrayed religion in it. I worked hard to get it right...
no subject
Date: 2005-08-08 04:11 pm (UTC)http://www.analogsf.com/0509/Sanctuary.shtml
Very cool, Michael. And there is no such thing as a last chance so long as you keep doing your best. :)
no subject
Date: 2005-08-08 04:20 pm (UTC)And I will keep trying, as always. Just finished 1500 words of a new story today.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-08 10:53 pm (UTC)However -- and this is something that I don't mention in the review -- the reason for the mainstream Stanquel religious view doesn't make sense to me. I don't understand how their population growth would be exponential without the proscription on certain pregnancies. If each female has two children, isn't that just replacement rate? Less, actually...
Maybe I missed something.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-09 12:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-09 12:08 am (UTC)