Why I Am Not Doing NaNoWriMo
Oct. 31st, 2005 10:17 pmYesterday morning, I woke up feeling sick. I had a stomach bug that hits me every few years, and makes me feel miserable. Usually it lasts only for the day, but this one lasted all through Sunday night and into Monday morning. So I took a sick day in order to recuperate.
Anyway, tomorrow starts the annual tradition of NaNoWriMo, or National Novel Writing Month, during which many aspiring writers set themselves a deadline of one month to complete a 50,000 word novel. If you're one of those writers who has decided to start the journey in just under two hours, I wish you the best of luck and hope you succeed. By all means, keep us apprised of your progress throughout.
But I will not be of your ranks for a simple reason, and it has nothing to do with lack of time or motivation. It is simply this:
I am not naturally a fast writer.
Some writers are naturally quick, able to sit down and generate a few thousand words at a clip. But others spend more time on their writing, taking the same amount of time to complete a few hundred words of prose fiction. Neither speed of writing is better than the other; it's just a question of what sort of writer a person is.
Over the past decade of short fiction writing, I've come to acknowledge that I take more time getting my words onto the page than many others do. It would go against my natural abilities as a writer to force myself into a speed race that I know I would not be able to win.
So for those of us who fall into the "slow writer" category, let me suggest NaNoWriYea (pronounced with a shout of "Yeah!" at the end), or National Novel Writing Year. After all, even if you're not doing NaNoWriMo, you can still write a novel. As Gay Haldeman once told me, "A page a day is a book a year."
Slow and steady can also win the race.
Anyway, tomorrow starts the annual tradition of NaNoWriMo, or National Novel Writing Month, during which many aspiring writers set themselves a deadline of one month to complete a 50,000 word novel. If you're one of those writers who has decided to start the journey in just under two hours, I wish you the best of luck and hope you succeed. By all means, keep us apprised of your progress throughout.
But I will not be of your ranks for a simple reason, and it has nothing to do with lack of time or motivation. It is simply this:
I am not naturally a fast writer.
Some writers are naturally quick, able to sit down and generate a few thousand words at a clip. But others spend more time on their writing, taking the same amount of time to complete a few hundred words of prose fiction. Neither speed of writing is better than the other; it's just a question of what sort of writer a person is.
Over the past decade of short fiction writing, I've come to acknowledge that I take more time getting my words onto the page than many others do. It would go against my natural abilities as a writer to force myself into a speed race that I know I would not be able to win.
So for those of us who fall into the "slow writer" category, let me suggest NaNoWriYea (pronounced with a shout of "Yeah!" at the end), or National Novel Writing Year. After all, even if you're not doing NaNoWriMo, you can still write a novel. As Gay Haldeman once told me, "A page a day is a book a year."
Slow and steady can also win the race.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-01 03:57 am (UTC)so, count me in! :)
no subject
Date: 2005-11-01 04:35 am (UTC)I also find myself wondering how many professional writers -- as opposed to aspiring writers seeking to be professionals -- participate. Speed for the sake of speed seems like something most editors would discourage, at least on that scale.
(I'm not trying to knock NaNoWriNo; I'm just wondering what the pros think of it, both writers and editors.)
no subject
Date: 2005-11-01 01:57 pm (UTC)I think most editors would probably say that NaNoWriMo isn't going to generate a lot of publishable fiction, but then again, neither does any other method. My guess is that the same percentage of NaNoWriMo participants will go on to publish as the percentage of those who write more slowly.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-01 06:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-02 02:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-01 10:19 am (UTC)NaNoWriMo sounds a great idea as a writing exercise, for someone with a drawerful of first chapters to make themselves just finish something. And I suppose if you were blocked on a great idea that just wouldn't work out, then telling yourself you were going to write that novel this month might be a way to find out whether it could be done (and get on with it) or decide it couldn't, and move on.
But for someone who actually writes novels to take time out for a month - no, why would you? (
no subject
Date: 2005-11-01 01:59 pm (UTC)And I do know some professional, published writers who have done or attempted NaNoWriMo. Most of those writers are publishing short stories, and decided that NaNoWriMo would help motivate them to write longer works.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-01 05:24 pm (UTC)I did learn one valuable lesson, tho: I cannot sustain 2500 or even 2000 words a day while holding down a full-time job without seriously jeopardizing my physical health. Before then, I had thought i might be able to "if only." After figuring that out once and for all, I stopped beating myself up about it.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-01 06:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-01 09:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-02 02:31 pm (UTC)I even have an icon for the start of National Novel Writing Year.
As a moderate (neither super fast nor super slow) speed writer, I'm glad NaNoWriMo works for some, and do think everyone should do what works for them, but I get a little bit tired of seeing speed being quite so encouraged, too.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-02 02:42 pm (UTC)I'm not as grumpy about NaNoWriMo as other people (such as
no subject
Date: 2005-11-01 11:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-02 02:31 am (UTC)I enjoyed your own post on NaNoWriMo, by the way.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-01 01:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-01 01:59 pm (UTC)The cool thing about NaNoWriMo is that you've got a whole community of people urging you on...
no subject
Date: 2005-11-01 02:08 pm (UTC)And you're right; the community is great.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-02 07:02 pm (UTC)But I became a writer in part because I didn't want to be doing the exact same thing 50,000 other people were doing, at the exact same time.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-02 11:20 pm (UTC)During my unemployment, I sometimes wrote 2,000-3,000 words a day, and usually close to 1,000. But I tended to rewrite an awful lot. Too much, probably.
I started falling into writers' block after Worldcon and never really got over it. Since my writing was going poorly, I looked for a contract job, and have a full time job that will last until the end of the year. Now, I'm too tired to write much at night.
So I have about 120,000 words total. It's either one 90,000 word contemporary novel plus the ending of another one, or a longer novel with about 30,000 words missing from the second half.
I actually thought of a different way to approach my project - what if you take the same set of charcters and have them "star" in different genres? The initial novel is contemporary/chick litty, but the second novel (or second half) is a near-future dystopia. There's even a fantasy component. I suppose I could work in a murder mystery somewhere, and a thriller. About the only part I couldn't squeeze my characters into would be a Western!
no subject
Date: 2005-11-03 09:25 pm (UTC)