[Rule quoted from Robert's Rules of Writing: 101 Unconventional Lessons Every Writer Needs to Know by Robert Masello (Writer's Digest Books, 2005). See my original post for the rules of this discussion.]
And speaking of controversy...
Even without the accompanying essay, Masello's seventh rule is fairly understandable. Masello bemoans what he calls the Starbucks School of Writing, the idea that aspiring writers will do their best work in a crowded coffee shop. In his own experience, his best writing gets done in his office, behind closed doors. He understands the temptation to sit among a crowd when writing -- after all, being alone in one's office is lonely -- but at the same time, he sees this as a form of performance art. People who go to a Starbucks to write, he says, are doing it less to get work done and more to be seen.
Now, I know from one of his previous books on writing that he had at least one bad experience with a person writing in Starbucks. He and a friend had gone to a Starbucks to have coffee and catch up, and a writer at the next table kept asking them to be quiet. At first, Masello gently pointed out to the writer that the coffee shop was not a library, and that he and his friend had the right to have a conversation. But when the writer got belligerent, so did Masello, and he essentially dismissed the writer with a mention of Rule #7.
I can certainly understand Masello's point of view on this. People go to coffee shops for all sorts of reasons, but being shushed by the people around you is not one of them. This is an important point. If you've made the conscious decision to write in a Starbucks, you need to accept the fact that you're in a public place where the people around you don't see themselves as visitors to your office, and will not take kindly to your asking them to keep it down. If you want to write in public and expect peace and quiet, go to a library instead. And if you need the peace and quiet to write, the Starbucks is most definitely out.
But on the other hand -- I have heard of many writers, and I mean professional, publishing writers, who routinely go to a public place to do their work. One who comes to mind is
kradical; I believe he does much of his work at a Starbucks near his home. I've also heard that Connie Willis has written many of her novels while sitting at a table in an independent cafe. And I too have taken advantage of a nearby Starbucks. I have to admit that I was less interested in the buzz of the cafe and more interested in exploiting their air conditioning -- but the fact is that while sitting in a Starbucks, I did manage to be quite productive, doing some writing for which I was eventually paid.
So in the end, although I understand where this rule comes from, I dismiss it. I wouldn't want writers to fool themselves into thinking that the Starbucks is the best place for them, but if it is, I wouldn't tell them to give it up. Write where you're most productive, whether that is your office, a Starbucks, or on a five-hour bus ride to nowhere.
Where do you write?
And speaking of controversy...
Even without the accompanying essay, Masello's seventh rule is fairly understandable. Masello bemoans what he calls the Starbucks School of Writing, the idea that aspiring writers will do their best work in a crowded coffee shop. In his own experience, his best writing gets done in his office, behind closed doors. He understands the temptation to sit among a crowd when writing -- after all, being alone in one's office is lonely -- but at the same time, he sees this as a form of performance art. People who go to a Starbucks to write, he says, are doing it less to get work done and more to be seen.
Now, I know from one of his previous books on writing that he had at least one bad experience with a person writing in Starbucks. He and a friend had gone to a Starbucks to have coffee and catch up, and a writer at the next table kept asking them to be quiet. At first, Masello gently pointed out to the writer that the coffee shop was not a library, and that he and his friend had the right to have a conversation. But when the writer got belligerent, so did Masello, and he essentially dismissed the writer with a mention of Rule #7.
I can certainly understand Masello's point of view on this. People go to coffee shops for all sorts of reasons, but being shushed by the people around you is not one of them. This is an important point. If you've made the conscious decision to write in a Starbucks, you need to accept the fact that you're in a public place where the people around you don't see themselves as visitors to your office, and will not take kindly to your asking them to keep it down. If you want to write in public and expect peace and quiet, go to a library instead. And if you need the peace and quiet to write, the Starbucks is most definitely out.
But on the other hand -- I have heard of many writers, and I mean professional, publishing writers, who routinely go to a public place to do their work. One who comes to mind is
So in the end, although I understand where this rule comes from, I dismiss it. I wouldn't want writers to fool themselves into thinking that the Starbucks is the best place for them, but if it is, I wouldn't tell them to give it up. Write where you're most productive, whether that is your office, a Starbucks, or on a five-hour bus ride to nowhere.
Where do you write?
no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 02:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 03:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 03:42 pm (UTC)I've never been to a Starbucks, but I have been to Peet's, and could never write there. Those little round torturous seats on the chairs, and those little tables without enough room to spread out my stuff...not to mention people coming and going.
Now, Denny's is great. I once wrote close to 3,000 words in Denny's. Once I stayed there seven hours and wrote every single minute, except when I got up to go potty (you have to consume lots of diet coke to justify your place there). In the off hours it is very quiet, and your brain quickly learns to tune out the canned music. They have comfy booths with big tables to hold all your papers, and waitresses to keep your glass full. Just be polite and don't come during the rush hour and take up a booth that would ordinarily have paying customers. And if you stay a long time, try to leave a tip for the waitress that acknowledges the fact that you've taken up her booth for 5 hours. Or you can order something, but that's very dangerous to your health and your pocketbook.
M
no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 04:36 pm (UTC)(and no, I've never written or tuned out in one of your classes, as far as I can remember...you have a very rare knack for making learning actually interesting.)
no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 05:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 05:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 05:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 05:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 11:47 pm (UTC)And at least in Spain, Starbucks is one of the only non-smoking cafés around.
Although I tend to visit the local gay and lesbian bookshop Berkana, which has a little-used café and, more importantly, a cat named Frida they rescued a few months ago...
:-)
I get far much more done when I'm there than if I stay home with all the distractions (and inherent laziness) to contend with.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 09:44 pm (UTC)I sometimes go to the Borders in our town for a few hours. Usually I write at my house, though (three different places that I haunt there). Sometimes I go to the library, but they are usually too quiet.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 09:58 pm (UTC)Coffee shops work for me because I've discovered I'm an introvert who perversely likes to be around people. Before I got a roommate, my apartment was just too quiet at times (though I have a fairly vocal cat, even she couldn't meow *all* the time). The temptation to do something to break the silence was too great. I would turn on the TV... and then get distracted from writing by Law & Order. Or I would turn on the radio... and pay more attention to NPR than my writing. Or I'd just get bored and get up to play a video game. But in a coffee shop, the noise is basically white noise; it doesn't distract me because it's uninteresting to me. However, I do have to concentrate in order to "tune it out"... and that naturally improves my focus. Since there's nothing else for me to focus on, I write.
I don't think I would've finished my last novel if I hadn't started going to Emack & Bolio's. I've already decided that if I ever get published, I'm including the staff of E&B in my acknowledgements. =)
no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 10:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 12:25 am (UTC)The advantage to notebook and pen is: no internet. Less temptation.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 04:26 am (UTC)And, obviously, I reject the rule, too. But then, I find most "rules" of writing to be horribly subjective.....
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 01:41 pm (UTC)I absolutely agree about the subjectiveness of many rules of writing. But I've also found that people who are just starting out, and haven't learned what works yet for them, benefit from learning of others' experiences. Just so long as they don't assume that what they hear is the "only" way to write.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 05:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 04:40 pm (UTC)