Pluto's Status Already Under Attack!
Aug. 17th, 2006 09:15 amOnly a day after the Society for the Preservation of Pluto as a Planet announced its existence to the world -- and, oh, yeah, the Planetary Definition Committee of the IAU recommended a definition that would keep Pluto as a planet -- Pluto's status is under attack from all sides. The Anti-Plutonian forces are marching, and we must do our best to keep them at bay.
Please see Under Attack! in the
savepluto LiveJournal to see what must be done to defend Pluto from the Anti-Plutonians!
Please see Under Attack! in the
no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 05:01 pm (UTC)I say Nay!
Captain: Discontinue Sarcasm Beam, Ensign.
Ensign: Discontinuing Sarcasm Beam, Aye Sir.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 09:42 pm (UTC)But I'm not particularly passionate about it.
Tell you what. I'll make a deal. Astronomers will have to call Pluto a planet, but in exchange, Paleontologists will have to abandon the name Apatosaurus in favor of Brontosaurus!
no subject
Date: 2006-08-22 01:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 07:22 pm (UTC)I mean, sure, schoolchildren all over the world have been taught that there are precisely nine planets ... but schoolchildren all over the world over the course of history have been taught that the sun orbits the earth or that humans have 48 chromosomes or that disease is due to an imbalance of humours or that air has a temperature-based "water holding capacity".
I'm not a big fan of retaining terminology for reasons of sentiment over science ... but then again, I'm not sufficiently passionate about it to label myself an Anti-Plutonian and picket for a status downgrade.
Maybe I should register PlutoIsMehWhatever.org.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 08:38 pm (UTC)