Brookline Town Meeting
Jun. 2nd, 2004 05:03 pmBrookline Town Meeting is in session right now; we met last night and we're meeting again tonight.
There's a lot of important issues we're debating. We just approved the town's $172 million budget. We're now offering only one health-care choice to town employees, so that it can be offered at a lower price, but the question is still in the air of when married same-sex couples will be offered benefits for the non-working spouse. Tonight we're once again debating a possible development project that would bring more money into the town, but at the risk of impacting a neighborhood, which itself is divided on the issue.
So what does the news media decide to focus on? The anti-spanking resolution.
http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news/3369474/detail.html
http://news.bostonherald.com/localRegional/view.bg?articleid=30105
Sigh.
There's a lot of important issues we're debating. We just approved the town's $172 million budget. We're now offering only one health-care choice to town employees, so that it can be offered at a lower price, but the question is still in the air of when married same-sex couples will be offered benefits for the non-working spouse. Tonight we're once again debating a possible development project that would bring more money into the town, but at the risk of impacting a neighborhood, which itself is divided on the issue.
So what does the news media decide to focus on? The anti-spanking resolution.
http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news/3369474/detail.html
http://news.bostonherald.com/localRegional/view.bg?articleid=30105
Sigh.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-02 02:47 pm (UTC)But since when are resolutions that "urge" anything proper agenda items for legislative bodies anyway? It's just a feel-good toothless show, and as you've seen, the media will jump on stuff like that instead of reporting on the real issues.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-02 03:16 pm (UTC)But this particular resolution...well, it's just minor.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-02 05:48 pm (UTC)And on the anti-spanking resolution (not that I'm taking the time to follow the links), I have to ask: so does that mean I can't spank G, or I can't spank S?? :-)
no subject
Date: 2004-06-03 11:51 am (UTC)Which is why I brought up (when no one else did) the question of same-sex marriage. Now that we have such a thing in this state, towns better be able to offer health insurance to the spouses of those marriages, just like they do for opposite-sex marriage.
As for the spanking question: spank S. all you want. :-)
no subject
Date: 2004-06-02 10:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-03 11:52 am (UTC)Last night we approved the zoning changes at 2 Brookline Place, for example. That's going to affect lots more than the spanking resolution.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-03 10:53 pm (UTC)