A year ago today, the world got the news that the last of the Big Three science fiction writers, Arthur C. Clarke, had died.
Growing up, I wasn't much of a Clarke reader. I loved Asimov's work, though, and Asimov himself used to say that people who liked his work also liked Clarke's. But for the most part, I never enjoyed Clarke's books as much as I did Asimov's. However, I did find Clarke's ideas mind-blowing, and I did enjoy Clarke's short stories more than his novels. (Who could forget "The Star" or "The Nine Billion Names of God"?)
I also loved Clarke's essays on science and the world. He seemed to have an innate inability to grasp the direction in which we were going as a species.
Oddly enough, when he died last year, I was in the middle of trying to figure out the plot of a new short story, the story that would give its title to my collection I Remember the Future. As I said in the book, Clarke's death somehow triggered in my mind exactly what I needed to write the story, and so I dedicated it to him.
As I noted last year when Clarke died, many people liked to quote his Third Law ("Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic") but I was more interested in exploring the ramifications of his Second Law: "The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible."
It's something I try to do every day.
Growing up, I wasn't much of a Clarke reader. I loved Asimov's work, though, and Asimov himself used to say that people who liked his work also liked Clarke's. But for the most part, I never enjoyed Clarke's books as much as I did Asimov's. However, I did find Clarke's ideas mind-blowing, and I did enjoy Clarke's short stories more than his novels. (Who could forget "The Star" or "The Nine Billion Names of God"?)
I also loved Clarke's essays on science and the world. He seemed to have an innate inability to grasp the direction in which we were going as a species.
Oddly enough, when he died last year, I was in the middle of trying to figure out the plot of a new short story, the story that would give its title to my collection I Remember the Future. As I said in the book, Clarke's death somehow triggered in my mind exactly what I needed to write the story, and so I dedicated it to him.
As I noted last year when Clarke died, many people liked to quote his Third Law ("Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic") but I was more interested in exploring the ramifications of his Second Law: "The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible."
It's something I try to do every day.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-19 04:13 pm (UTC)At the top of the display is Clarke's Second Law in three-inch tall letters.
Oddly, I have never read much Asimov -- only a few odd short stories in old collections. I never read a lot of Heinlein either. I absolutely love Clarke's short stories though (and have read a few of his books too, though the short form is where he really excelled). Quite a fan of Niven's as well.
I still love Arthur C. Clarke's comment, in 1997, around the time that HAL 9000 was first invented in the 2001: A Space Odyssey timeline, of what HAL's first words would have been:
I think of that as a very powerful two-sentence Clarke short story. ;)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-19 07:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 07:05 pm (UTC)