I am reminded of Fisher v. Lowe, No. 60372 (Mich. Crt.App.):
We thought that we would never see A suit to compensate a tree. A suit whose claim in court is prest Upon a mangled tree's behest. A tree whose battered trunk was prest Against a Chevy's crumpled chest. A tree that may forever bear A lasting need for tender care. Flora lovers though we three We must uphold the court's decree.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2004-10-20 06:38 pm (UTC)We thought that we would never see
A suit to compensate a tree.
A suit whose claim in court is prest
Upon a mangled tree's behest.
A tree whose battered trunk was prest
Against a Chevy's crumpled chest.
A tree that may forever bear
A lasting need for tender care.
Flora lovers though we three
We must uphold the court's decree.