![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
This week, I want to take a slightly different approach in my biweekly announcement of our latest The Brookline Parent column up at Brookline Patch. I actually have a bit more to say than I wrote for the column, so what I'd ask you to do is go read the column first, then come back here. Okay? I'll wait.
Girls Can Be Astronauts, Too
As you may have guessed at reading the column, I'm very concerned both about the opportunities my daughters will have as they grow older, and how they will react the first time they come up against the prevailing sexist attitude that still exists throughout much of the world.
For many years, I was a teacher of science and mathematics. I taught many female students, who ranged in competency just like their male counterparts; but what always struck me was their different attitudes. Many more girls than boys felt that the topics were inherently difficult and that they just couldn't "get it." What shocked me was that even the girls who were brilliant at math and science often felt this way, much more often than the boys who excelled.
I came to realize that this attitude wasn't inherent in them; it couldn't possibly be. Over their lives, many of my female students had internalized the notion that girls either weren't good in math or science or weren't expected to be good in math and science, because other people had told them this, either explicitly or implicitly. When you grow up in a culture that dismisses your abilities, you come to believe that your abilities are insignificant.
I'm grateful that in general the culture in the United States is not nearly as difficult for women as many others, but even here there is sexual harassment. Earlier this week, I read an article from the New York Times, Keeping Women Safe Through Social Networking, in which writer Joe Sharkey begins by stating bluntly that "Every female business traveler I know concedes that she has experienced at least some kind of sexual harassment on the road. Usually it’s verbal, though sometimes it’s physical." This is the kind of sentence that ought to be a revelation to every man who comes across it. No, strike that. This is the kind of sentence that there should be no reason to write in today's world. And yet, there it is.
As I noted in my column, I try to do what I can to combat cultural sexism, such as praising my daughters for being smart as well as cute. (And no question about it, they are smart.) But I do worry about how my own unconscious attitude may affect them as well.
For example, Nomi and I are part of a religious tradition in which men appear to take the dominant role in ritual. Now, I do understand that there's more, much more, underneath the surface. Women actually play an extremely important role in Judaism. The way we practice the tradition, women are seen as closer to perfection than men are, which is why they don't have the same time-bound obligations that men do. Women are charged with making sure that the traditions get passed along in the home, which is just as important a charge as the men's charge to see that the traditions get passed along in synagogue ritual. Furthermore, at least from a Conservative and Orthodox viewpoint, Judaism passes through the mother, and not the father. It is the mother's Jewish status that determines the Jewish status of the children, and not the father's.
Despite all this, though, the surface of our practice can appear unequal. If strangers unfamiliar with Judaism and Jewish traditions walk into our shul, they will see men leading the service and performing almost all of the ritual, while seeing women participate in a more limited capacity. And even though, as I noted, there is much more importance placed on women's roles under the surface, I still feel that this weekly surface presentation can lead some folks to dismiss the underlying importance of women in the tradition, and by extension, in the overall culture.
At the same time, though, my religious traditions are important to me, and I do want to pass them along to my children. More than that, I want them to come to love their traditions in the same way that Nomi and I do, just like I want them to love science and mathematics, science fiction, literature, dancing, good food, politics, sports, music, art – in short, everything. I want them to know that no doors are closed to them. So I strive not just to show my belief in them, but to find them role models to follow as they grow older. And I am grateful that there are so many women role models to present to them.
I ended the Brookline Patch column by noting sadly that I still think we have a long way to go. I'd like to end this post by noting hopefully that we've already gone farther than many people would have expected fifty years ago.
Girls Can Be Astronauts, Too
As you may have guessed at reading the column, I'm very concerned both about the opportunities my daughters will have as they grow older, and how they will react the first time they come up against the prevailing sexist attitude that still exists throughout much of the world.
For many years, I was a teacher of science and mathematics. I taught many female students, who ranged in competency just like their male counterparts; but what always struck me was their different attitudes. Many more girls than boys felt that the topics were inherently difficult and that they just couldn't "get it." What shocked me was that even the girls who were brilliant at math and science often felt this way, much more often than the boys who excelled.
I came to realize that this attitude wasn't inherent in them; it couldn't possibly be. Over their lives, many of my female students had internalized the notion that girls either weren't good in math or science or weren't expected to be good in math and science, because other people had told them this, either explicitly or implicitly. When you grow up in a culture that dismisses your abilities, you come to believe that your abilities are insignificant.
I'm grateful that in general the culture in the United States is not nearly as difficult for women as many others, but even here there is sexual harassment. Earlier this week, I read an article from the New York Times, Keeping Women Safe Through Social Networking, in which writer Joe Sharkey begins by stating bluntly that "Every female business traveler I know concedes that she has experienced at least some kind of sexual harassment on the road. Usually it’s verbal, though sometimes it’s physical." This is the kind of sentence that ought to be a revelation to every man who comes across it. No, strike that. This is the kind of sentence that there should be no reason to write in today's world. And yet, there it is.
As I noted in my column, I try to do what I can to combat cultural sexism, such as praising my daughters for being smart as well as cute. (And no question about it, they are smart.) But I do worry about how my own unconscious attitude may affect them as well.
For example, Nomi and I are part of a religious tradition in which men appear to take the dominant role in ritual. Now, I do understand that there's more, much more, underneath the surface. Women actually play an extremely important role in Judaism. The way we practice the tradition, women are seen as closer to perfection than men are, which is why they don't have the same time-bound obligations that men do. Women are charged with making sure that the traditions get passed along in the home, which is just as important a charge as the men's charge to see that the traditions get passed along in synagogue ritual. Furthermore, at least from a Conservative and Orthodox viewpoint, Judaism passes through the mother, and not the father. It is the mother's Jewish status that determines the Jewish status of the children, and not the father's.
Despite all this, though, the surface of our practice can appear unequal. If strangers unfamiliar with Judaism and Jewish traditions walk into our shul, they will see men leading the service and performing almost all of the ritual, while seeing women participate in a more limited capacity. And even though, as I noted, there is much more importance placed on women's roles under the surface, I still feel that this weekly surface presentation can lead some folks to dismiss the underlying importance of women in the tradition, and by extension, in the overall culture.
At the same time, though, my religious traditions are important to me, and I do want to pass them along to my children. More than that, I want them to come to love their traditions in the same way that Nomi and I do, just like I want them to love science and mathematics, science fiction, literature, dancing, good food, politics, sports, music, art – in short, everything. I want them to know that no doors are closed to them. So I strive not just to show my belief in them, but to find them role models to follow as they grow older. And I am grateful that there are so many women role models to present to them.
I ended the Brookline Patch column by noting sadly that I still think we have a long way to go. I'd like to end this post by noting hopefully that we've already gone farther than many people would have expected fifty years ago.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 04:33 pm (UTC)Are you going to let your girls wear pants, or are they supposed to wear skirts all the time? I ask because I hate skirts (I'm a tomboy) and I see them as very limiting in terms of freedom of movement. What women wear can have a huge impact on how they see themselves and how they're treated.
I'm especially annoyed at the current fashion trend for young teenage girls to dress like they're going to a bar to pick up men.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 04:47 pm (UTC)(Also, I've always thought that being able to wear a skirt, especially in warmer weather, would be nice.)
One thing I do insist on is that they dress modestly. But I think boys and men should dress modestly too.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-05 12:09 am (UTC)I only wear skirts at Renaissance Faires and similar events. I gave my younger brother my utilikilt (http://www.utilikilts.com/), which is cool int eh summer without being restrictive.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-06 04:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-06 05:53 pm (UTC)None of those would have been a punishment; my parents were so busy with my baby brothers and my mom was such a scatterbrain that I got to do very little as a child.
The biggest mistake that my parents made was that they denied me so many things, I had no motivation whatsoever to please them, or be "good." I acted out a lot becuase I felt I was being constantly punished for being the oldest (and the child from another marriage) so I ignored and broke a lot of rules.
It made me feel better; if I was going to be constantly miserable due to my parents incompetence, at lease I could sleep at night because I felt I deserved it a bit. I don't think you and Gnomi will have these problems, but try to keep in mind rewards as well as punishments.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 04:58 pm (UTC)In seeking to empower your daughters, you can make use of those findings by encouraging your daughters in their hard work and accomplishments, as well as occasionally letting them know that they are, indeed, cute and smart. Since I read the book, I've tried to modify the praise I give my son, making sure to tell him that I like the work he is doing, as well as occasionally letting him know he could do better, when applicable.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 05:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 05:04 pm (UTC)The first is on a matter of fact, not opinion. Thoman Sowell demonstrated years ago that men and women are paid equally for their work history. That is, a man who takes two years off to raise a child will take the same salary hit as a woman. He also discusses total family income, the purported earning power of various ethnic groups... it's quite a read.
The second is a matter of opinion. I'm familiar with Soleveichick's (sp?) attempts to square the circle about the role of women in Orthodox Judiasm with an elaborate of justifications and double talk. The fact remains that women have no role in the synagogue, the central focus of Jewish life, and precious little elsewhere.
Have you ever met a woman who was president of her synagogue? Are there Orthodox synagogues that allow women to deliver "sermons" to the congregation? They're scarce as hen's teeth. And I speak of our shared "Modern" Orthodox community; in the right-wing communities, women are utterly invisible -- literally hidden from view -- in every gathering: at services, at weddings, at other civic functions such as award dinners. I once attended the annual dinner of a girls' high school wherein only men spoke, and the award to a particular family was presented to the father and the son; the wife and daughter could not step the podium.
I think you have it exactly backwards. The wide world offers your daughters the opportunity to be anything she wants, regardless of "old Russian women" (of all genders, background, and ethnicity). Your home environment and religion will likely steer them into certain habits of mind that will almost impossible to overcome.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 05:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 09:25 pm (UTC)I didn't say that my spouse or yours agrees with me.
On the other hand, the women's t'fillah group that my wife attends does not attract the younger generation, and the hard-fought battle to have these groups meet at all has been for nought as far as they can tell; the general drift to the right has mesmerized the daughters of the attendees.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-06 05:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-06 04:41 pm (UTC)Look at the choices of the chareidi women: instead of running away screaming, they marry men with no useful skills, support them as the men laze about in kollel, and raise the children to boot. If that's not a form of brainwashing, I don't know what is.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-06 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-06 10:09 pm (UTC)People do make choices you don't approve of without having been brainwashed into them.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 06:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 09:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 09:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-06 04:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 07:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-06 04:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 06:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 08:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 08:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-06 04:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-04 10:00 pm (UTC)Careers and gender
Date: 2011-03-05 01:36 am (UTC)For those who do marry, I have noticed that two things drive who stays home with children - whether the couple believes strongly in nursing for the first year, and who earns more. Biologically most women cannot sustain supply and work full time for an entire year. And couples undestandably tend to prioritize the career of the partner with greater earning potential.
I knew a transsexual IT professional who had applied for jobs as both man and woman (she/he looked quite natural as either gender) and received two responses to the same resume, depending on the perception of gender. As a woman, she was told she was overqualified and/or requesting too much compensation. As a man, he was told he was a great fit and they could discuss salary.
Re: Careers and gender
Date: 2011-03-06 04:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-06 12:21 am (UTC)Speaking as an Orthodox Jew and a feminist, I have to say this: our practice is unequal. Some of this is down to actual halacha. Far, far more of it is down to tradition that carries the weight and effective inflexibility of law.
The fact is that there are doors closed to us in our tradition, and we as women have the choice of accepting that, trying to change it, or moving to a tradition where that isn't the case. Or pretending it isn't the case. It's not an easy decision.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-06 12:50 am (UTC)As to the rest... not just to strangers and people unfamiliar with Jewish traditions.
I think that there is something potentially problematic about separate but equal even if you posit that the equal really is equal -- one is still saying that one's gender determines one's role.
How feminist would it sound to you if I said that saying women had to stay at home with the kids wasn't unequal, because raising children is just as important as working outside the home?
It wouldn't sound very feminist to me. Even though I truly believe that raising children is just as important as working outside the home, and even though I believe it's feminist to make sure women's traditional work is not devalued compared to men's traditional work.
Because the missing piece is letting women choose men's traditional work if that's what they, as individuals, feel called to, and men choose women's. And that's what this tradition does not allow.
You say you want them to know that no doors are closed to them, but some doors are closed to them -- they can't be rabbis or cantors, at least not and remain within the tradition you're talking about.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-06 04:43 pm (UTC)It has not escaped my notice that if my daughters were to choose to become rabbis or cantors, they would have to either work to change the tradition we are currently within, or else move to another tradition. Not everyone in my position would say this, but if they chose to move to a different tradition in order to pursue a career as a rabbi or cantor, I would support them.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-06 06:56 pm (UTC)Easy for me to spout advice, of course, when I have no kids of my own. But so many people I know keep secrets from their parents because they're sure the parents wouldn't approve/understand their choices. Maybe they're right, but I often wonder if the parents would be horrified less by the choices than by what their kids assume about them.
It seems so likely to me that they're not so inflexible as they are thinking that these are hard and messy conversations, so they'll wait and cross that bridge if they come to it. And they don't realize what message their silence sent in the meantime, or that their kids came to the bridge years ago, and crossed it alone.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-06 10:13 pm (UTC)Another difficult decision.
*hugs you*
*and Nomi and the twins*
no subject
Date: 2011-03-06 02:33 am (UTC)we have a long way to go, and true equality will never be reached.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-06 04:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-06 04:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-07 03:08 pm (UTC)But to answer your question, no, the boys have pretty good self-perception. I don't know how to account for the difference.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-06 04:56 am (UTC)I talked it over with a friend from Russia, and he speculated that perhaps she was from a more remote area, where the propaganda was not so active and where people tend to be more provincial.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-06 04:46 pm (UTC)